§331.3. Custody or visitation proceeding; court-ordered child custody evaluation
A. The court may order a child custody evaluation in a custody or visitation
proceeding for good cause shown. The child custody evaluation shall be made by a licensed
mental health professional, as defined in R.S. 9:331, using the Association of Family and
Conciliation Courts' Guidelines for Parenting Plan Evaluations in Family Law Cases.
B. To serve as a court-ordered child custody evaluator in accordance with this
Section, a licensed mental health professional shall have completed at least five
co-evaluations under the direct supervision of another court-ordered child custody evaluator.
Licensed mental health professionals who completed at least five court-ordered child custody
evaluations prior to August 1, 2024, are not required to complete the co-evaluations in order
to serve as a court-ordered child custody evaluator.
C. The court may order a party or the child to submit to and cooperate in the
evaluation, testing, or interview by a child custody evaluator.
D. In a case where domestic abuse is an issue, the child custody evaluator shall have
current and demonstrable training and experience working with perpetrators and victims of
domestic abuse.
E. The court may render judgment for the costs of the child custody evaluation, or
any part thereof, against any party or parties as the court may consider equitable, taking into
consideration the parties' ability to pay. The court may also preliminarily allocate costs at
the outset and reserve the right to reallocate costs upon conclusion of the custody matter.
F. The child custody evaluator shall provide the parties with a written report. This
report shall state the basis of the evaluator's conclusions or recommendations and the extent
to which the information obtained limits the reliability and validity of the opinion and the
conclusions and recommendations of the evaluator.
G. There shall be no presumption in favor of the child custody evaluator's findings.
H. The child custody evaluator shall serve as a witness, subject to cross-examination
by a party.
I. When a child custody evaluator has been appointed by the court, there shall be no
ex parte communication by the litigants or their attorneys with the child custody evaluator
unless authorized by law or court order or agreed to by the parties. All oral communication
with the child custody evaluator shall be by teleconference or meeting in which each party
to the proceeding participates either through the party's attorney or as a self-represented
litigant. All written communication or correspondence to the child custody evaluator, along
with any attachments thereto, shall be provided contemporaneously to all parties to the
litigation or their attorneys of record. Communications initiated by the child custody
evaluator with a litigant for the purpose of conducting the court-ordered evaluation shall not
be considered ex parte communications prohibited by this Subsection.
J. Child custody evaluations conducted pursuant to this Section are subject to the
following evidentiary restrictions:
(1) All opinion testimony offered by a child custody evaluator shall be subject to
Code of Evidence Articles 702 and 703.
(2) No child custody evaluator conducting an evaluation pursuant to this Section
shall undertake or perform any other role or function relative to the parties or children.
(3) Every child custody evaluator conducting an evaluation pursuant to this Section
shall comply with all statutory and administrative licensing and ethical rules and regulations
otherwise applicable to the profession.
(4) All parties shall have the right to full pretrial discovery of the entire file of the
child custody evaluator regarding the case, including the right to depose the child custody
evaluator.
(5) No indigent parent shall be denied the opportunity to depose, cross-examine, or
otherwise challenge a court-appointed child custody evaluator in the same manner as a
nonindigent parent, and any fees and costs incurred in any such deposition shall be
considered within the purview of Code of Civil Procedure Article 5185.
(6) No evidence concerning polygraphs, voice-stress analysis, or other such
physiological measures shall be admitted into evidence in any form.
(7) All psychological testing, principles, diagnoses, and concepts utilized by a child
custody evaluator shall be limited to those which have been empirically established and
generally accepted in the mental health profession as valid and reliable for the parameters
and conditions purportedly tested or the issues evaluated.
Acts 2024, No. 552, §1.