§440.5. Admissibility of videotaped statements; discovery by defendant

            A. The videotape of an oral statement of the protected person made before the proceeding begins may be admissible into evidence if:

            (1) No attorney for either party was present when the statement was made;

            (2) The recording is both visual and oral and is recorded on film or videotape or by other electronic means;

            (3) The recording is accurate, has not been altered, and reflects what the witness or victim said;

            (4) The statement was not made in response to questioning calculated to lead the protected person to make a particular statement;

            (5) Every voice on the recording is identified;

            (6) The person conducting or supervising the interview of the protected person in the recording is present at the proceeding and available to testify or be cross-examined by either party;

            (7) The defendant or the attorney for the defendant is afforded an opportunity to view the recording before it is offered into evidence; and

            (8) The protected person is available to testify.

            B. The admission into evidence of the videotape of a protected person as authorized herein shall not preclude the prosecution from calling the protected person as a witness or from taking the protected person's testimony outside of the courtroom as authorized in R.S. 15:283. Nothing in this Section shall be construed to prohibit the defendant's right of confrontation.

            C. In a criminal prosecution, when the state intends to offer as evidence a copy of a videotaped oral statement of a protected person made pursuant to the provisions of this Subpart, the defendant, through his attorney only, may be provided a copy of the videotape if the court determines it necessary to prepare a proper defense. If the defendant's attorney is provided a copy of the videotaped statement by court order or by permission of the district attorney, only the following persons involved in preparing the defense of the instant charges shall be permitted to view the videotape: the attorney and his regularly employed staff, the defendant, the defense investigator designated to work on the case, the defense paralegal designated to work on the case, and other staff members of the attorney who are transcribing the videotaped oral statement. Other than a transcript of the videotaped oral statement, no copies of the videotape shall be made by any person, except for use as trial exhibits. The copy of the videotaped statement and any transcripts shall be securely retained by the defendant's attorney at all times and shall not be possessed, transferred, distributed, copied, or viewed by any unauthorized party. It shall be the affirmative duty of the defendant's attorney to return the videotape to the court immediately upon conclusion of the case, but in all cases prior to sentencing. A defendant who appears pro se in a criminal proceeding shall be allowed reasonable access to the videotape of a protected person only with an order of the court and under court-directed supervision. The tape shall be filed as part of the record under seal by the clerk of court for use in subsequent legal proceedings or appeals and shall be released only upon motion of the state or counsel of record with an order of court and in compliance with this Section. Any violation of this Subsection shall be punished as contempt of court. Any person who makes an unauthorized disclosure of the videotape or its contents may also be subject to liability for civil damages, including punitive damages.

            D. Any requirement that a copy of a videotaped statement of a protected person be provided to a criminal defendant's attorney, to a court, or to any other person entitled by law to such a copy may be satisfied by providing electronic access to view the videotaped statement in a manner that is sufficient to protect the rights of the criminal defendant under the United States Constitution and the Constitution of Louisiana. This Subsection does not permit any of the following:

            (1) The authorization of a pro se criminal defendant to electronically access a copy of a videotaped statement of a protected person.

            (2) The negation or circumvention of any requirement that a physical copy of the videotaped statement of a protected person be produced at a criminal trial where a party is introducing the videotaped statement of a protected person as evidence at the criminal trial.

            Acts 1984, No. 563, §1; Acts 1990, No. 654, §1; Acts 2004, No. 241, §1; Acts 2008, No. 85, §1; Acts 2014, No. 138, §1; Acts 2026, No. 91, §1.